Jv Operating Agreement

This type of integrated JOA was used by health systems that wanted to integrate operations, but also wanted to maintain their separate business existence. Two or more health systems would form a jointly managed organization, with governance divided between the new entity and existing entities. As part of a contractual agreement, revenues were shared and capital expenditures were made on a pre-established basis. Such a JOA is not contrary to cartel and abuse legislation, as it has been considered an integrated joint venture, with each partner sharing the risk. As a result, related companies could conduct joint negotiations and strategic planning through the joint organization. In 1996, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) decided that such integrated joint ventures of not-for-profit health care providers could retain their non-profit status. In other words, the IRS viewed the joint venture as an extension of exempt related companies and not as a new taxable entity. In some cases, specific legislation has been passed by Congress to provide exceptions for cartels and abuse of dominance for common enterprise agreements in certain sectors. In 1970, Congress passed the Newspaper Preservation Act, which granted a waiver of agreements and abuse of dominance to joint enterprise agreements between two competing dailies in the same geographic markets. Joint enterprise agreements provide for provisions governing specific operational partnerships between two or more organizations, be they private companies, companies or public bodies such as cities and states. Joint transactions differ from joint ventures in which two or more companies pool resources to create a third entity jointly owned by both parties. In joint operations, two or more organizations of resources and manpower contribute to a particular project in which each entity retains its own identity and, at the end of the project, introduces its own identity and pathways.

Understanding the purpose of common enterprise agreements and common sections within them can inform the functioning of these partnerships from a legal point of view. The JOA must be distinguished from mergers. In the event of mergers and acquisitions, ownership of the new entity is merged. When one company merges with another, the result is a unique property. In the case of joint enterprise agreements, the two or more companies involved remain held separately. Common enterprise agreements are not necessarily related to breaches of agreements. It is only when common enterprise agreements involve price fixing, market distribution and profit sharing that they violate U.S. cartel and abuse of dominance legislation. JOAs, which are limited to combined cost-cutting and economies of scale operations, are permitted.

Any contract, agreement, joint venture or other agreement between two or more companies in which the activity and physical entities of a failing company are merged, while each entity retains its separate entity status in terms of profits and individual orders.

Posted in Uncategorized