Paris Agreement Harvard Reference

194 Tom Switzer, Paris Agreement Is a Triumph of Hope over Facts, Sydney Morning Herald (30 December 2015), in www.smh.com.au/comment/paris-climate-agreement-is-a-triumph-of-hope-over-facts-20151227-glvfd0.html. 96 As one observer in Paris put it, “You are equally in agreement that all fairies should ride unicorns.” Jeff Goodell, Will the Paris Climate Deal Save the World?, Rolling Stone (January 13, 2016), at www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/will-the-paris-climate-deal-save-the-world-20160113?page=2. At the 2011 UN Climate Change Conference, the Durban Platform (and the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action) was created with the aim of negotiating a legal instrument to tackle climate change from 2020. The resulting agreement is expected to be adopted in 2015. [62] 198 Z.B. Paris Agreement marks unprecedented political recognition of climate change risks, Economist (Dec. 12, 2015), at www.economist.com/news/international/21683990-paris-agreement-climate-change-talks (Paris “far from the botched imbroglio of the Copenhagen climate summit”); Harvey, note 10 above (contrast between Paris and Copenhagen “couldn`t have been bigger”); Savaresi, Annalisa, The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning?, 34 J. Energy Nat. Res. L. 16, 18 (2016)Google Scholar (describes Copenhagen as “the lowest point in the history of the climate regime”).

While the United States and Turkey are not part of the agreement, as countries have not declared their intention to leave the 1992 UNFCCC as “Annex 1” countries, they will continue to be required under the UNFCCC to prepare national communications and an annual greenhouse gas inventory. [91] The amount of NDCs set by each country[8] sets the objectives of that country. However, the “contributions” themselves are not binding under international law, for lack of specificity, normative character or mandatory language necessary for the creation of binding norms. [20] In addition, there will be no mechanism to compel a country to set a target in its NPP by a set date, and no implementation if a target set out in a NSP is not met. [8] [21] There will be only one “Name and Shame” system[22] or, as János Pásztor, UN Under-Secretary-General for Climate Change, cbs News (USA) stated, a “Name and Encourage” plan. [23] Given that the agreement has no consequences if countries do not comply with their obligations, such a consensus is fragile. A stream of nations withdrawing from the agreement could trigger the withdrawal of other governments and lead to a total collapse of the agreement. [24] If you need additional guidance on finding books, contact the librarians at the reference desk. Reference times are available on the Diamond Law Library homepage. 51 Z.B Anne-Marie Slaughter, The Paris Approach to Global Governance, Project Syndicate (28 December 2015), www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/paris-agreement-model-for-global-governance-by-anne-marie-slaughter-2015-12. 54 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, art.

. . .

Posted in Uncategorized