Independent legal advice focuses on the fact that any party with another lawyer explains the terms of the agreement to them and informs them of what is in their best interest. While it is not normally necessary for parties to a conjugal agreement to have independent lawyers, it may serve as an additional safeguard clause. Courts will be more inclined to abide by the terms of a marriage pact if it is clear that both parties had their own lawyer and that they understood the agreement they reached. TURKEY Marriage agreements are allowed in Turkey. There are three types of discretionary plans: asset separation, participation in separate assets and partnership in assets. Marital agreements entered into under foreign law and valid under this right may be enforceable in Italy, provided they are not valid for public policy reasons. TURKEMENISTAN It is reported that a foreign man wishing to marry a Turkmen woman must first sign a marriage agreement with the proposed spouse on the basis of a model provided by the state. In India, marital agreements are very rare and have no laws in force. However, in the face of rising divorce rates, there is a growing interest in them. Some legal experts believe that prenups have no legal sanctity in India. However, in some cases, usually among wealthy citizens, a form of contract is signed.
But agreements must be reasonable and not violate existing laws, such as the Hindu Marriage Act. Indian courts allow for the signing of a settlement protocol during divorces. But no court has yet been asked to impose a prenup.  The courts will not impose the requirements for a person to pass all the chores or for the children to be raised in a particular religion.  In recent years, some couples have included social media provisions in their marriage contracts and have set rules on what can be posted on social media during the marriage, and in case the marriage is dissolved.  The forum selection clauses are widely validated by Japanese courts. Their validity in marital agreements that oppose the jurisdiction of the Japanese courts is likely to be upheld if the case in question is not within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Japanese courts and if the jurisdiction designated by the agreement would have independent jurisdiction over the case in question, in accordance with the law applicable in that forum. A prenup may protect assets already acquired by one partner from not being claimed by the other, but these assets should normally be detailed in the agreement. Even in countries that have not adopted UPAA/UPMAA such as New York, properly executed marriage contracts have the same presumption of legality as any other treaty.  It is not necessary for a couple who signs a marriage pact to keep separate lawyers to represent him as long as each party understands the agreement and signs it voluntarily with the intention of being bound by its terms. There is a strong public policy that favours parties that control and decide their own interests through contracts. There are no state or federal laws requiring adults with contractual capacity to hire a lawyer in order to enter into a marriage contract such as a marriage contract, with the exception of a California law that requires the parties to be represented by a lawyer if spousal assistance (support) is limited by the agreement.  The marriage agreement may be challenged if it is proven that the contract was signed under duress.  Whether a pre-marriage contract was signed under duress must be justified by the facts and circumstances of this case. For example, it was found that a spouse`s assertion that she believed there would be no marriage if it was not a marriage, where the marriage was only two weeks away and marriage plans had been made, was not sufficient to demonstrate coercion.  A marriage agreement does not solve all the problems you may have with your spouse. Find out what a pre-marriage contract can and cannot do to: